By Noah Gittell
Should we discuss the plot? Is there a plot? Or just a series of adequately-staged stunts surrounded by a few quips and a vague sense of character? I’m still not sure, but it all has something to do with Russia. As the “story” begins, McClane’s son (Jai Courtney) has been arrested for murder in Moscow. Father and son have been estranged for a few years – the script never bothers to tell us why – but McClane decides to jet over there and check things out anyway. He quickly learns things are not what they seem. Yes, John Jr. works for the CIA, but beyond that, it’s impossible to get a handle on what the problem is, who the actual bad guys might be, and what the McClane family solution is beyond “winging it” and “killing the bad guys.”
Willis seems to be trying a little harder than he has in recent years – I counted two actual attempts at emoting – but that only makes his failure even sadder. Although some critics will simply say the “Die Hard” franchise has passed its sell-by date, there is a way to do this right. Other long-running franchises have addressed the increasing age of their stars or the change in cultural mores embodied by new eras by making them more vulnerable. The makers of “A Good Day to Die Hard” take the opposite tack, making the aging Willis even more impervious to harm. After jumping off not one, but two buildings, and surviving a horrific car crash, you begin to wonder if the regular old guy from the original “Die Hard” was in really a superhero all along. His invulnerability to injury does little for the story but lower the stakes.
As for the film’s politics, they are as muddled as the rest of the film. Upon hearing that McClane would travel to Russia in this one, I had hoped the setting was an indication that the film would acknowledge its Cold War roots. No such luck – if it is possible to make an apolitical movie about the CIA’s activities in Russia, this is it. Perhaps the best we can say is that the film reflects poorly on both America and Russia, since every character in the movie is an idiot. Every opportunity to nudge the plot towards the slightest geopolitical subtext is quickly discarded (Sample dialogue: “You know what I hate about Americans? Everything.”), and the setting seems ultimately as arbitrary as everything else in the film.
With heightened tension between the U.S. and Russia in recent years, perhaps this “Die Hard” can at least stand as an example of good diplomacy; I noted in the credits that the crew seemed equally divided between Americans and Russians. Am I grasping at straws, trying to find some tiny silver lining in this lifeless dark cloud of a movie, to suggest that there is something good in that? Probably. The last film I can remember that was made in collaboration with Russia was last year’s “Branded,” which would have been considered the worst film of the year had anyone seen it. If these two films are any indication, the future of diplomacy between these two former enemies is not bright. It may, in fact, give “mutual destruction” a whole new meaning.
My Rating: Skip it Altogether
The artificial turf and drainage installation will transform an 82,000-square-foot athletic field on 6.75 acres…
The Rye Record is looking for a talented advertising sales director.
The new owner of G. Griffin Wine & Spirits plans to continue the business as…
County Executive George Latimer maintains a substantial fundraising lead over his Democratic primary opponent --…
If you live in the Rye City School District, you may find just what you…