Ethics Board Offers No Immediate Answers to Questions Posed

The Board of Ethics convened Thursday morning to once again review the matter of Mayor Doug French’s alleged building violations at 13 Richard Place, as well as the unwarranted STAR exemption he received for over a decade on that home he rents out.

February 2, 2012
3 min read
boe

The Board of Ethics convened Thursday morning to once again review the matter of Mayor Doug French’s alleged building violations at 13 Richard Place, as well as the unwarranted STAR exemption he received for over a decade on that home he rents out.

 

By Jim Byrne

 

The Board of Ethics convened Thursday morning to once again review the matter of Mayor Doug French’s alleged building violations at 13 Richard Place, as well as the unwarranted STAR exemption he received for over a decade on that home he rents out.

But, after a closed-door executive session that lasted close to 90 minutes, the Board of Ethics (BOE) offered no answers – publicly, at least – to the questions Deputy Mayor Peter Jovanovich submitted last week. On hand for the meeting were Board members Ted Dunn, Beth Griffin Matthews, Judge John Alfano, City Manager Scott Pickup, and Corporation Counsel Kristin Wilson. Neither Mr. Pickup nor Ms. Wilson recused themselves this time, as they had done at the previous BOE meeting, basing their decision on the specificity of the questions posed.

 

boeCity Assessor Noreen Whitty and Building Inspector Maureen Eckman, subjects of the “preferential treatment” questions Councilman Jovanovich asked, also attended the meeting, along with members of the press and Ray Tartaglione, who originally brought the matter to light. Ms. Mathews asked the press and public to leave the room after the initial public session, so that the BOE could discuss in executive session, since it had to do with personnel.

 

Members of the press and Mr. Tartaglione waited outside the Mayor’s Conference Room during executive session, but were not alerted when public session eventually resumed. The meeting had already been adjourned, and BOE members filed out without obliging to requests for comment on whether a decision had been reached.

 

Ms. Mathews said before executive session that it’s not up to Mr. Tartaglione to accept or not accept whatever determination was made. On a need to create a public record, Mr. Alfano added, “If parties or the City doesn’t like the conclusion they then have a record so they can go to an Article 78 or another procedure … it has to be a black and white on-paper record.”

 

Mr. Pickup interjected that the BOE needed to start with the two “very distinct questions” and that any other issues would then become self-evident. Ms. Wilson agreed, saying the Board’s obligation was to answer those two questions, notwithstanding what the public or anyone else may think or like. “The process has so far followed what is written in the City Code, and our job is to look at it and respond.”

 

Said Judge Alfano, “When I got the letter [from Deputy Mayor Jovanovich] my gut reaction was to kick it back to him and say, ‘What are the facts?’ I know everyone is interested in resolving this, and that the Council doesn’t want things to trickle on.”

 

Ms. Wilson replied, “Since we have two staff members here that pertain to both questions, the best way to start is to ask questions we might think we need answers to. I think that is the initial first step. If we need more experts then we go there but that might be jumping the gun.”

 

The BOE was charged with answering the following: 1) Did Mayor French seek or receive preferential treatment by City employees in the granting of STAR exemptions for his properties at 13 Richard Place and 46 Meadow Place? 2) Did Mayor French seek or receive preferential treatment from City employees in the manner the City and its Building Department handled a complaint regarding a potential violation of the building code at 13 Richard Place?

 

Right before the BOE went into executive session, Mr. Tartaglione read a lengthy statement that concluded, “I have supported an unbiased, objective, transparent investigation headed by parties independent in both appearance and in fact. These individuals must gather all the evidence available, consider the merits of everything above in a transparent process and render a judgment that the public can understand and accept. Anything less will give the appearance of being a whitewash and yet another impropriety.”

 

Minutes of the meeting will be made available within the week.

Filed Under:
Subscribe and get freshly baked articles. Join the community!
Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

kuwin

iplwin

my 11 circle

betway

jeetbuzz

satta king 786

betvisa

winbuzz

dafabet

rummy nabob 777

rummy deity

yono rummy

shbet

kubet

winbuzz

daman games

winbuzz

betvisa

betvisa

betvisa

baji999

marvelbet

krikya

Dbbet

Nagad88

Babu88

Six6s

Bhaggo

Elonbet

yono rummy

rummy glee

rummy perfect

rummy nabob

rummy modern

rummy wealth

jeetbuzz

iplwin

yono rummy

rummy deity

rummy app

betvisa

lotus365

hi88

8day

97win

n88

red88

king88

j88

i9bet

good88

nohu78

99ok

bet168

betvisa

satta king

satta matta matka

betvisa

mostplay

4rabet

leonbet

pin up

mostbet

rummy modern

Fastwin Login

Khela88

Fancywin

Jita Ace

Betjili

Betvisa

Babu88

jeetwin

nagad88

jaya9

joya 9

khela88

babu88

babu888

mostplay

marvelbet

baji999

abbabet

Jaya9

Mostbet

MCW

Jeetwin

Babu88

Nagad88

Betvisa

Marvelbet

Baji999

Jeetbuzz

Mostplay

Jwin7

Melbet

Betjili

Six6s

Krikya

Jitabet

Glory Casino

Betjee

Jita Ace

Crickex

Winbdt

PBC88

R777

Jitawin

Khela88

Bhaggo