School Bond Vote

Rye School Board Ignores Half the Community and Puts Forth Fake Compromise On March 12, Rye voters defeated a school bond referendum by the narrowest […]

April 30, 2019
2 min read

Rye School Board Ignores Half the Community

and Puts Forth Fake Compromise

On March 12, Rye voters defeated a school bond referendum by the narrowest of margins—just ten votes. The result can be seen as a reasonably accurate proxy for the community’s attitude towards the bond: half believe the bond is excessive while half believe otherwise. Given this split you would think the School Board would try to accommodate the views of <<<half the community>>> before scheduling another referendum. You would be wrong.

Leading up to the vote, many residents raised legitimate concerns about the bond. Given that these concerns were shared by about <<<half the community>>> you would think the School Board would publicly address these before scheduling another referendum. Again, you would be wrong.

Don’t be fooled by the Board’s new tricky two-step ballot: first a vote on a $70 million bond and then a vote on an additional $10 million bond. This is a fake compromise. The Board apparently believes they simply need to pressure a few more parents to get out and vote and then can ignore the wishes of <<<half the community>>>. But we are Garnets too.

It’s chilling to see such hubris, especially in a once congenial community like Rye. Rather than accommodate, the School Board prefers to dictate. Until now, Rye has always found a middle path that balances the enthusiastic desires of school parents and the rest of taxpayers who provide the majority of resources that keep our schools great.

Rye taxpayers continue to face declining property values. And, having just paid our federal taxes without the benefit of a full property tax deduction, we now know the true burden that the Rye School Board imposes on us. The School Board is determined to make a bad situation worse.

On June 11 stand with that <<<half of the community>>> that believes even the $70 million bond is excessive. Just vote “NO”.

 

  • Robert N. Laughlin

 

Filed Under:
Subscribe and get freshly baked articles. Join the community!
Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

kuwin

iplwin

my 11 circle

betway

jeetbuzz

satta king 786

betvisa

winbuzz

dafabet

rummy nabob 777

rummy deity

yono rummy

shbet

kubet

winbuzz

daman games

winbuzz

betvisa

betvisa

betvisa

baji999

marvelbet

krikya

Dbbet

Nagad88

Babu88

Six6s

Bhaggo

Elonbet

yono rummy

rummy glee

rummy perfect

rummy nabob

rummy modern

rummy wealth

jeetbuzz

iplwin

yono rummy

rummy deity

rummy app

betvisa

lotus365

hi88

8day

97win

n88

red88

king88

j88

i9bet

good88

nohu78

99ok

bet168

betvisa

satta king

satta matta matka

betvisa

mostplay

4rabet

leonbet

pin up

mostbet

rummy modern

Fastwin Login

Khela88

Fancywin

Jita Ace

Betjili

Betvisa

Babu88

jeetwin

nagad88

jaya9

joya 9

khela88

babu88

babu888

mostplay

marvelbet

baji999

abbabet

Jaya9

Mostbet

MCW

Jeetwin

Babu88

Nagad88

Betvisa

Marvelbet

Baji999

Jeetbuzz

Mostplay

Jwin7

Melbet

Betjili

Six6s

Krikya

Jitabet

Glory Casino

Betjee

Jita Ace

Crickex

Winbdt

PBC88

R777

Jitawin

Khela88

Bhaggo